Frequently Asked Questions
About Adjudication

Adjudication is a formal process by which the final position of an unfinished game is analyzed by an unbiased third party, who then declares that position a win for one player or else declares the position drawn.

In some instances, this evaluation is based on specific analysis leading to a definitive conclusion, i.e., forced mate, forced draw or "won ending" whose technique is documented in the literature. In others, a definitive analysis is not possible and the adjudicator must rely on general principles. Here he will usually award a win for material advantage but not for "positional" advantage alone. See CCLA Server Rule 14.

It is necessary to limit the duration of play, particularly for multiple-round events, in order to achieve timely advancements and/or the awarding of prizes. Also, if an opponent dies or withdraws, and there is no replacement (as in team play,) CCLA awards an unrated win to his remaining opponents in the section. Results occurring before a death or withdrawal are not cancelled (and the reason why taking early draws is unwise.) Players have the option of seeking an adjudicated (and rated) result, although great care should be exercised here. While he may gain some rating points, a player cannot improve his tournament standing through adjudication, and risks losing ground on both counts!

Adjudication of a game can only occur when one of the players has requested it. For postal and email games, an adjudication request consists of a legible gamescore and diagram of the final position (in server play, the server TD already has this information.) Analysis supporting a claim of win or draw is optional. Requests are sent to the appropriate Tournament Director, who may perform the adjudication himself, or pass it on to another (high-rated) player. Players who submit adjudication requests will receive written disposition from the Tournament Director.

No such "permission" is ever required. Usually only one player requests adjudication. Sometimes both players file requests, perhaps with conflicting claims. While it's unlikely both players would claim a win, one player could do so while his opponent claims a draw.

CCLA's postal and email events are 24 months duration, with some championship finals running 30 months. CCLA server events are limited to 16 months playing time. Because transit time for server moves is essentially zero, a typical 40-move game played on the server will be finished in a few months. Even slower players, or players engaged in a lengthy endgame often finish under the one-year mark. Most CCLA games are played to a finish. The exceptions are when an opponent dies, withdraws from play, or forfeits due to exceeding the time limit.

Most adjudications are trivial (the result is obvious,) do not involve a counter-claim and are filed because an opponent has died or withdrawn. The process is administered by the CCLA T.D., and it is he who makes the final decision, even if an independent adjudicator assisted. Per CCLA Server Rule 4, any decision by the T.D. may be appealed to the CCLA President, whose decision is final

Never request adjudication unless you are convinced your position on the chess board merits the result you are claiming. Adjudication requests are not some formality to gain rating points. If your opponent has died or withdrawn from play, you have already received an unrated win toward your section total. Now, if you request adjudication and the verdict is a draw or a loss for you, then that +1 in the cross table is replaced by 1/2 or 0.

Team players should give this careful thought, as they could cost their team a crucial point or half-point in the standings, chasing after rating points via adjudication. If you don't have a sure win, you're better off taking the unrated win as opposed to a rated draw or loss. Moral: do not submit frivolous adjudication requests.

Since you have already been awarded a +1(F) forfeit, a rated win, you may not also submit the game for adjudication. +1, +1(A) and +1(F) all mean exactly the same in terms of rating points and section scores; you cannot get the same result rated twice. One is not "better" than another. Many players are incensed by their opponents' forfeits and withdrawals. If you want the world to know you out-played an opponent who chose to disappear, or stopped answering your moves rather than resigning, then annotate your brilliant play and submit the game score to the CC editor and / or webmaster for publication!

Submitting analysis isn't required in CCLA. Rarely does a participant submit objective analysis; he is trying to "prove" his win or draw claim and doesn't put sufficient effort into examining his opponent's resources. Experienced adjudicators largely ignore analysis submitted by the players, instead performing their own independent assessment.

Many players mistakenly believe the adjudicator will note their superior play or higher rating and award them a win on the assumption they'd continue to outplay the opponent. In adjudication, both sides take on the strength of a Bobby Fischer! The adjudicated result is a realistic, objective evaluation of the position, not of the players, their ratings or tournament standing. Ideally, an adjudicator works "in the blind;" he should not have access to the tournament name, players' names or their ratings. His only concern is the position to be evaluated, to determine the most likely outcome based on best play by both sides.

When he advises you of his decision, the Tournament Director may provide some brief analysis, but is not required to do so. To point out a mate-in-three or a short combination to win decisive material is easy enough, but a Rook and pawn ending could require reams of analysis. Chess instruction is not an objective of the adjudication proce

CCLA events run 16, 24 or 30 months; the length of a playing session is known at the outset and players can prepare for adjudication. However, if your opponent dies or withdraws unexpectedly, you're stuck with the position at hand. Players should keep this possibility in mind when initiating gambits,